Consultation record
Submissions accepted in part
Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Submissions
390 documents · page 1 of 13
Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.
| Reference | Consultation | Respondent | Point raised |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/003 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Anselm Mountstephen | The database set omits sources relevant to the compounds in scope |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/004 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Kolawole Isaksen-Balogun | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/005 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Professor Bartolomeu Nkosi-Lindegaard | Sponsor concentration should be a recorded characteristic of a body of evidence |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/008 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Oisín Rautavaara | The framework does not say when a concern warrants one level and when it warrants two |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/013 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/015 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Yaa Kettlewell | No information-size criterion is applied before an interval is judged |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/003 | Draft supplier evaluation rubric | Dr Quentin Zimmerthal | Two anchors on the same criterion can both describe the same supplier |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/004 | Draft supplier evaluation rubric | Dr Fitzwilliam Danquah-Öberg | Documentary practice is weighted equally with analytical evidence |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/007 | Draft supplier evaluation rubric | Dr Yaa Kettlewell | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/009 | Draft supplier evaluation rubric | Dr Oisín Rautavaara | Scores are reported to a precision the underlying judgements do not support |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/001 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Vasilisa Immelmann | Nothing prevents a chromatogram being reprocessed until it passes |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/003 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Wolfram Quintanilha industry | The additional determinations required would materially increase release testing cost |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/010 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Rukayat Zaleski-Mbeki | Nothing requires a laboratory to demonstrate ongoing performance |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/011 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Melisande Thorsby-Nakamura | Nothing in the standard addresses transfer of the method between laboratories |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/013 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Fenella Steenkamp-Ferreira | A field classified as critical is not one a reading turns on |
| DRAFT-RP-HPLC-PURI/005 | Draft standard: determination of chromatographic purity by… | Dr Abimbola Sotomayor-Ekwueme | Nothing addresses the container the material was held in |
| DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/008 | Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3 | Quentin Whitmarsh-Obi | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/012 | Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3 | Dr Henrike Jastrzębska | The analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/005 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Henrike Jastrzębska | The recorded evidence gaps omit outcomes a reader would consider material |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/006 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Katarzyna Yorkstone | Where the compound is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, the cardiovascular outcome… |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/008 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/013 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-Mbeki | The analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/015 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Frideswide Nordhagen | The interaction section lists mechanisms rather than interactions |
| DRAFT-BPC-157-MONO/003 | Draft monograph: BPC-157 | Dr Fenella Steenkamp-Ferreira | The interaction section lists mechanisms rather than interactions |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/001 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/003 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Vasilisa Immelmann | Regulatory assessment documents were not searched |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/004 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Georgiana Zimmerthal | Studies not published in English were excluded without assessment |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/005 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-Ilunga | The search was limited by publication date and the limit is not justified |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/006 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Ivo Mountstephen | The review protocol is described but its registration record is not linked |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/010 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Adaeze Underhill-Okafor | Two included studies do not meet the registered eligibility criteria |
page 1 of 13