Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted in part

Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.

Submissions

390 documents · page 1 of 13

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/003Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Anselm MountstephenThe database set omits sources relevant to the compounds in scope
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/004Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunPoint estimates are given without an interval
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/005Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Professor Bartolomeu Nkosi-LindegaardSponsor concentration should be a recorded characteristic of a body of evidence
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/008Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Dr Oisín RautavaaraThe framework does not say when a concern warrants one level and when it warrants two
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/013Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Ms Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafThe document is unreadable without specialist training
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/015Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Dr Yaa KettlewellNo information-size criterion is applied before an interval is judged
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/003Draft supplier evaluation rubricDr Quentin ZimmerthalTwo anchors on the same criterion can both describe the same supplier
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/004Draft supplier evaluation rubricDr Fitzwilliam Danquah-ÖbergDocumentary practice is weighted equally with analytical evidence
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/007Draft supplier evaluation rubricDr Yaa KettlewellPoint estimates are given without an interval
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/009Draft supplier evaluation rubricDr Oisín RautavaaraScores are reported to a precision the underlying judgements do not support
DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/001Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standardDr Vasilisa ImmelmannNothing prevents a chromatogram being reprocessed until it passes
DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/003Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standardDr Wolfram Quintanilha industryThe additional determinations required would materially increase release testing cost
DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/010Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standardRukayat Zaleski-MbekiNothing requires a laboratory to demonstrate ongoing performance
DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/011Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standardDr Melisande Thorsby-NakamuraNothing in the standard addresses transfer of the method between laboratories
DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/013Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standardDr Fenella Steenkamp-FerreiraA field classified as critical is not one a reading turns on
DRAFT-RP-HPLC-PURI/005Draft standard: determination of chromatographic purity by…Dr Abimbola Sotomayor-EkwuemeNothing addresses the container the material was held in
DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/008Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3Quentin Whitmarsh-ObiReferences should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source
DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/012Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3Dr Henrike JastrzębskaThe analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/005Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Dr Henrike JastrzębskaThe recorded evidence gaps omit outcomes a reader would consider material
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/006Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Dr Katarzyna YorkstoneWhere the compound is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, the cardiovascular outcome…
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/008Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Ms Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafThe document is unreadable without specialist training
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/013Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-MbekiThe analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/015Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Dr Frideswide NordhagenThe interaction section lists mechanisms rather than interactions
DRAFT-BPC-157-MONO/003Draft monograph: BPC-157Dr Fenella Steenkamp-FerreiraThe interaction section lists mechanisms rather than interactions
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/001Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Ms Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafThe document is unreadable without specialist training
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/003Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Dr Vasilisa ImmelmannRegulatory assessment documents were not searched
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/004Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Georgiana ZimmerthalStudies not published in English were excluded without assessment
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/005Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaThe search was limited by publication date and the limit is not justified
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/006Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Ivo MountstephenThe review protocol is described but its registration record is not linked
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/010Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Dr Adaeze Underhill-OkaforTwo included studies do not meet the registered eligibility criteria

page 1 of 13

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.