Consultation record
Submissions accepted in part — page 3
Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Submissions
390 documents · page 3 of 13
Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.
| Reference | Consultation | Respondent | Point raised |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/002 | Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically… | Thaddeus Isaksen-Balogun | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/005 | Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically… | Dr Odalys Thorsby-Nakamura | The search was limited by publication date and the limit is not justified |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/001 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Dr Jerome Petrossian | A surrogate outcome is used as the anchor without validation evidence |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/003 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/004 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Quentin Whitmarsh-Obi | The review protocol is described but its registration record is not linked |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/005 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Dr Yaa Kettlewell | Crossover trials are pooled with parallel-group trials without adjustment |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/007 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Dr Vasilisa Sandringham-Adu | Studies not published in English were excluded without assessment |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/008 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Dr Matthias Wintringham industry | A sponsor trial meeting the eligibility criteria was excluded |
| DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/010 | Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedation | Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-Ilunga | The search was limited by publication date and the limit is not justified |
| DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/002 | Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human… | Thaddeus Isaksen-Balogun | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/004 | Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human… | Dr Kolawole Isaksen-Balogun | Crossover trials are pooled with parallel-group trials without adjustment |
| DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/005 | Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human… | Georgiana Zimmerthal | Studies not published in English were excluded without assessment |
| DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/006 | Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human… | Stellan Cholmondeley-Ade | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/011 | Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human… | Dr Oisín Rautavaara | The axis of the forest plot exaggerates a small difference |
| DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/013 | Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human… | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | Patient-reported outcomes are collected by the trials and not reported by the review |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-DOS/008 | Draft format of the supplier dossier series | Dr Zdenka Nyquist-Obiora | The anchor outcome for an indication is not the outcome a decision turns on |
| DRAFT-PEOPLE-REGIS/011 | Draft policy on the register of members and reviewers | Dr Evander Ashworth-Danquah | The secretariat answers submissions and is not itself named |
| DRAFT-CORRECTIONS-/001 | Draft corrections and versioning policy | Anselm Mountstephen | The threshold between a correction and a new version is drawn too high |
| DRAFT-CORRECTIONS-/004 | Draft corrections and versioning policy | Dr Quentin Enthoven | The materiality threshold for a declarable holding is set too high |
| DRAFT-CORRECTIONS-/012 | Draft corrections and versioning policy | Professor Bartolomeu Nkosi-Lindegaard | The standards applying to advertising placement are not published |
| DRAFT-CORRECTIONS-/019 | Draft corrections and versioning policy | Dr Vasilisa Immelmann | A party criticised in an assessment should have a right of reply |
| DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/002 | Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of… | Dr Liesbeth Achterberg | Nothing requires a laboratory to demonstrate ongoing performance |
| DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/003 | Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of… | Dr Quentin Zimmerthal | Results are reported without an estimate of measurement uncertainty |
| DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/005 | Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of… | Dr Liesbeth Nyquist-Obiora | Nothing addresses the container the material was held in |
| DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/006 | Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of… | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/007 | Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of… | Dr Melisande Thorsby-Nakamura | A system suitability criterion is unachievable on instrumentation in general use |
| DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/009 | Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of… | Dr Brigitta Grünbaum-Sowande | Acceptance criteria are expressed in terms specific to one instrument family |
| DRAFT-INDICATION-S/004 | Draft indication set and anchor outcomes | Dr Adaeze Underhill-Okafor | A fixed section structure will force empty sections |
| DRAFT-INDICATION-S/014 | Draft indication set and anchor outcomes | Dr Oisín Rautavaara | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-INDICATION-S/015 | Draft indication set and anchor outcomes | Dr Vittoria Quintanilha | A document is split across parts at a point that separates a claim from its support |
page 3 of 13