Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) in primary mitochondrial myopathy and bioenergetic disorders — evidence extract

No eligible study has been identified for NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) in primary mitochondrial myopathy and bioenergetic disorders. The Institute records the question as not assessed and states what would change that.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-045/EV-MITOCHONDRIAL
Series
Evidence extract
Version
2.1
Published
23 Aug 2026
Last reviewed
23 Aug 2026
Next review
23 Aug 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.45
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2026 Q3

§1Evidence extract: Primary mitochondrial myopathy and bioenergetic disorders

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
Genetically determined impairment of oxidative phosphorylation producing myopathy, exercise intolerance or multisystem disease.
Intervention
NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), intravenous infusion, subcutaneous or intranasal in research contexts; oral precursors are a separate matter
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
Six-minute walk distance

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Primary mitochondrial myopathy symptom assessment; Muscle phosphocreatine recovery kinetics.

§1.2Contributing trials

No trial has been identified for NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) in primary mitochondrial myopathy and bioenergetic disorders. No certainty rating is issued where that is so, for the reason given at §1.3.

§1.3Why no certainty rating is issued

The Institute rates certainty in a body of evidence. Where no eligible study has been identified there is no such body, and the domain-by-domain assessment used elsewhere in this series is not rendered: an inconsistency judgement requires two estimates to be inconsistent with one another, and an imprecision judgement requires an interval. Neither exists here.

The outcome is therefore recorded as not assessed. It is listed in the certainty index under that heading rather than at the lowest rating, because a rating of very low certainty says that evidence was found and is weak, and that is not what has happened.

What would change this: a controlled study in the population stated at §1.1, reporting the anchor outcome, retrievable in a form the Institute can appraise. The evidence gaps recorded in the monograph at §9 state what such a study would need to measure.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Lee C, Zeng J, Drew BG, Sallam T, Martin-Montalvo A, Wan J, Kim SJ, Mehta H, Hevener AL, de Cabo R, Cohen P. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes metabolic homeostasis and reduces obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Metabolism 2015;21(3):443–454. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.009 · PMID 25738459
  2. Szeto HH. First-in-class cardiolipin-protective compound as a therapeutic agent to restore mitochondrial bioenergetics. British Journal of Pharmacology 2014;171(8):2029–2050. doi:10.1111/bph.12461 · PMID 24117165
  3. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨85⟩ Bacterial Endotoxins Test. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.